65 Delmar Avenue Framingham, MA 01701 email@example.com 508-561-8452 June 10, 2013 Office of the Middlesex District Attorney 15 Commonwealth Avenue Woburn, MA 01801 781-897-8300 Attn: Marian T. Ryan Dear Madam, The following is a complaint against Jessica Hogan, a member of your staff who made the case that I was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt on two charges, Assault: MGL-265 13a, and Vandalism MGL-266-126a. She made the following statement to the judge: The Commonwealth does believe that they've proven beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant did cause an assault, placing the complaining witness in fear of imminent bodily damage and as well as vandalizing the property which is her car. On the assault charge, I'd like to ask exactly how did the Commonwealth prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the complaining witness was in fear of imminent bodily damage, other than the complainant's mere statement that she was in fear? Is that all that is needed for proof beyond a reasonable doubt. This is a very important question to be answered. I'd also appreciate a more definitive understanding of the concept of assault when it constitutes a crime against a person but I never touched her. On the vandalism charge, no photographic evidence was submitted to show damage and only after I spent 25 days in prison, did the judge, David W. Cunis, state that he had seen no damage on the car door. The complainant distinctly told Jessica Hogan that there was damage. So my next question, is what damage did Jessica Hogan see? I saw no damage, the judge belatedly saw no damage, but Jessica Hogan to this day never admitted what she saw. If the judge did not see any damage, then I claim that Jessica Hogan committed perjury. The other notion that bothered me is that Jessica Hogan did not even want to see the evidence of vandalism, I was amused by judge David W. Cunis's remarks: The burden of proof rests exclusively with the Commonwealth to prove that you are guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. The burden of proof is a strict and heavy burden. The burden of proof is proof beyond a reasonable doubt. My judicial complaint is on the web and shows far more detail including the full court approved trial transcript from which it was derived: http://www.framingham-police.org/judicial-complaint.html I have included a printed copy of the page for your perusal. My claim is Jessica Hogan, acting under the color of law, committed perjury (as did judge David W. Cunis), and failed to provide any exculpatory evidence. Furthermore, she failed to accuse the complainant of perjury. What was done to me was highly repugnant and does not come close to something called justice, and I can thank Jessica Hogan for that. Your response will of course be reflected on my web sites. If you have any questions, all my contact information is shown above and on above mentioned web page. Sincerely yours Harold J. Wolfe
65 Delmar Avenue Framingham, MA 01701 firstname.lastname@example.org 508-561-8452 August 6, 2013 Office of the Middlesex District Attorney 15 Commonwealth Avenue Woburn, MA 01801 781-897-8300 Attn: Marian T. Ryan Dear Madam, I submitted a complaint to you on one of your staff members Jessica Hogan, back in early June and you have failed to respond to my complaint. Do you consider yourself above the law and you no longer have to respond to anyone for anything? Do you believe you have prosecutorial immunity? You have been served. http://www.framingham-police.org/judicial-complaint.html If you have any questions, all my contact information is shown above and on above mentioned web page. Sincerely yours Harold J. Wolfe
|Middlesex District Attorney
Marian T. Ryan
8 Bradford Road (or 8 Pearl St)
Belmont, MA 02478
Current salary: $92,884.71
Marian T. Ryan is a catholic.
July 5, 2013:
It should be clear to any idiot that these are catholic indoctrination centers.
Marian T Ryan is related to Jennifer Barry, who is 41 years old and lives in Braintree, MA. Marian T Ryan is also related to Maureen Ryan, who is 68 years old and lives in Abington, MA.
|Belmont resident appointed Middlesex District Attorney||April 23, 2013|
|Belmont Citizen Herald||Belmont Citizen Herald|
Belmont resident Marian T. Ryan has been appointed to be the next Middlesex District Attorney by Governor Deval Patrick.
"I am humbled by the responsibility which the Governor has entrusted to me," said Ryan. "I am thrilled to be leading the Office where I have spent my entire professional career and I look forward to continuing its long tradition of excellence."
Ryan has worked as a Middlesex County assistant district attorney for more than thirty years. She has risen through the ranks of the office, serving under 5 different District Attorneys, as a District Court supervisor, a Superior Court trial team captain, and as the Chief of the Domestic Violence and Elder/Disabled Units. Most recently, she has served as General Counsel and Chief of the Elder and Disabled Unit under former District Attorney Gerry Leone.
Throughout her career, she has prosecuted hundreds of cases, including that of Walter Emery, a case which had remained unsolved for more than 20 years until he was convicted in 2007 for the murder of a mother of three. She has also briefed and argued more than 40 cases in the Appeals Court and the Supreme Judicial Court.
Ryan has been a passionate advocate for the most vulnerable victims, including the elderly and developmentally disabled people who have been taken advantage of financially and physically abused.
She has also been actively engaged in the Office's outreach and training efforts, and has developed and led programs on work place violence prevention and school safety.
Ryan has been an adjunct professor at Emmanuel College and Wentworth Institute, and is currently teaching at Lasell College. She is a graduate of Boston College Law School and a past recipient of the school's David S. Nelson Public Service Award. She received her undergraduate degree from Emmanuel College.
|Send comments to: email@example.com|