Robert V. Greco
Judge Robert V. Greco has now resigned due to age, but he was the chief judge (the big Kahuna, First Justice) of the Framingham District Court.
Framingham District Court
Before becoming a member of the bench in 1985, Judge Greco was Executive Director and General Counsel of the State Ethics Commission. From 1974 to 1980, he served in the Criminal Bureau of the Attorney General's Office. Previously, he was with the Massachusetts Defenders Committee for three years. Judge Greco taught on the adjunct faculty of the New England School of Law and Boston University Law School, and served as chairperson of the Committee on Judicial Ethics.
Title First Justice
Year of Appointment/Governor
Prior Judicial Offices (Dates):
Prior Public Service
Prior Professional Employment Massachusetts Defenders Committee (1971 - 1974) Criminal Bureau, Attorney General's Office (1974 - 1980) General Counsel and Executive Director, State Ethics Commission (1980 - 1985)
Civic Activities: Member, Board of Directors, Boston Latin School Association
Judicial Branch Committees and Activities:
(508) 620-9110; Fax: (508) 620-9118;
On April 14, 2014, Greco attended a prayer breakfast that promotes diversity. I'm pretty certain that he talks to god. If god talks back, we have a schizophrenic judge. And how might he know that it's god and not just some big invisible turtle in the sky, or Satan. Inquiring minds want to know.
Here's a bit of diversity for you Robert.
You like diversity!
65 Delmar Avenue Framingham, MA 01701 July 10,, 2013 508-561-8452 email@example.com Framingham District Court 600 Concord Street P.O. Box 1969 Framingham, MA 01701 Attn: Judge Robert V Greco Dear sir, I am writing to you concerning the injustice that you helped perpetrate on me by assigning my case to your cohort, David W. Cunis. My complaint is documented on the web at: http://framingham-police.org/judicial-complaint.html The buttons on top expand to other web pages. I include a printed copy of the main complaint. I ask that you take less than 30 minutes to read it and enjoy it. It contains tales of perjury, arrogance, stupidity and other human traits. If the complainant states clearly that I had allegedly damaged her car and the DA acknowledges her statement, and the judge belatedly states he had seen no damage on the car, then someone lied. In fact, all four of them lied. The judge, David W. Cunis convicted me but later recanted his visual observations, the DA, Jessica Hogan by claiming she had proven beyond a reasonable doubt that I was guilty of felony vandalism, the police officer Robert F. Tibor by describing damage that was very different than the damage claimed by the complainant, even if his testimony was all hearsay from the complainant, and finally the complainant lied since it conflicts with the judge's recantations. I sincerely hope that as the First Judge of the Framingham District Court and someone who has allegedly taught judicial ethics, you will closely examine my complaint and one of these days, someone might actually ask the complainant about her car door and examine it closely. By the way I have plenty of closeup pictures of her door should you wish to examine evidence. Cunis, Hogan and Tibor did not seem interested. Cunis made the extraordinary claim that dents in car doors heal themselves (11/16/2012), and I hope you can provide me with evidence of such peculiar behaviour in sheet metal. Perjury is considered a serious offense as it can be used to usurp the power of the courts, resulting in miscarriages of justice. That would be your court, sir. There was the hilarious restitution paper (damage assessment report, as I call it) that no one asked any questions about because it might have been embarassing to do so, given the police report. The "piece de resistance" however, was judge Cunis's remarkable statement about the alleged damage after we had seen the door, and I was questioning officer Tibor. That's a keeper for all times. It's even more absurd given his recantations. The question I would most like answered is: When did Cunis realize he had not seen any damage on the door? When he examined the door (10/05/2012), or just after I got out of prison (10/30/2013)? I realize that you will be forced to resign in less than a year but your response to my complaint will be part of your legacy in your retirement. Sincerely yours, Harold J. Wolfe
|Send comments to: firstname.lastname@example.org|