Previous hearings
Date Status
20230922 Arrested
20230925 Arraignment
20231106 Pre-trial hearing, DA had missing records
20240117 Discovery and Compliance, DA had missing records
20240418 Discovery and Compliance, DA had missing records
Court case moved to Worcester.
Case delayed until 20240628.
20240628 Met with Worcester DA, Matthew J. Mullaney
It's not clear if anything happened other than me getting his email address.
Matthew did meet with Ernest while I was at the courthouse
Met my new judge of the week Steven D. Power
20240827 Next court appearance

Questions for DA/Judge

Worcester DA: when were you notified that my case had been transferred to you?
Do you possess any documentation on this?
Who notified you by name and address?
Did you read the message I sent?
Did you listen to the audio?


What exactly am I being charged with ?
What is the nature of the crime?
What harm have I caused?
Am I being charged with harrassment?

What are the penalties for the violation of this law


Do you believe in God?
Have you read the bible?

Are you gay?
If so, are you a member of

What does HTML stand for

What is a URL?
What is a web server?
What is a WWW domain?
What is the first file a web server accesses on any given domain?
Can you name any web server?
Can you name a web browser?
Which web server does your office use?
Which web browser do you use on your computer?
Why is the world wide Web called the web?
What is special about the word web?
Do you know what is required to view the source of an HTML page on the web
Can you identify a linked image or linked text in a source HTML file? HREF
Do you know what a dark file on the web is?
Ever heard of WGET or CURL as an Internet tool?


What is the definition of harassment according to Massachusetts law
Please read out loud the message I relayed to Ernest and Heather
Who am I addressing?
Explain to me in simple words why this constitutes harassment?
Who was the police officer that justified my arrest?
What exactly was the justification for an arrest?
Who am I addressing in this message ?
What do I say that constitutes harassment to Lucien in any form whatsoever


This is the content of the web page in question (ernest-20230921.html)

  1. Who is the message addressing? Lucien or Ernest?

  2. What is the specific definition of harassment?


    Six grand to deck Paul

    At the 7:50 mark in the video...

    Back off immediately if you don't want your lives destroyed.

    Your real wife Margaret Lee will discuss this with you.

    You and Lucien could face hard time and of course.
    Avery could get a new DCF mommy.

    And thank Lucien for me.

    This offer to your son Lucien shows:
    your distinctively strong homophobia,
    your religious zealotry
    your remarkable insensitivity to the quality of Lucien's future life.
    DCF would be fascinated by your parental skills
    Additionally, texts from you on Margaret's phone indicate you wish to kill Paul.
    Could you send those texts to the Framingham police? Pretty please.

    Lucien lived with me for two and a half years until about August 20, 2023.
    His mother and I transported him to school and back. Ernest Shane Perce was not involved with school stuff.

    As far as I know, I am able to communicate with Ernest Shane Perce and his consort, Heather Puglisse in any way I choose.

    If I had sent the same info to Ernest and Heather via text or email, it would not involve this alleged

    Harrassment Prevention Order . Note that it says Harrassment

    The main web site is: http://www.mass-gov-courts.org/
    The page under consideration is: ernest-20230921.html

    My actions were limited to creating the ernest-20230921.html file
    I then issued an FTP command to place this file on a disk that my http://mass-gov-courts.org web server has access to.
    The key is that I did not link it into the web site using the " linked-file HTML entries.

    I then emailed Heather Puglisse and Ernest Shane Perce and sent them the complete pathname.

    http://mass-gov-courts.org/ernest-20230921.html

    At this point, three people knew of this file, Myself, Ernest and Heather. It was a private message sent via the web

    If Ernest or Heather did not show that file to Lucien he would never see it, even if he were smart enough
    to upload the entire http://mass-gov-courts.org/ site (about 2.5 GB) using WGET

    The file ernest-20230921.html is called a dark file simply because it is not linked in.
    It's a straggler sitting on a disk drive, available to a web server but available only if you know the specific name:

    ernest-20230921.html

    It's a dark web page. It's there but you must know it's complete name.

    Show me clearcut evidence that Lucien saw this file without Ernest/Heather showing it to him.

    Did Lucien even see it.

    Is it harassment if Lucien did not see it?
    Is it harassment if it is not harassment.
    Did a tree fall in the forest if no one heard it?

    Did anyone read the message? It was addressed to Ernest.
    The message does not in anyway harass Lucien.
    If it does, you'll have to explain it to me very slowly.
    I am fascinated that no one seems interested in the content of the message.
    Michael L. Fabbri was not the least bit interested.
    He really wanted to rush this along for a quick prosecution.

    Here's a message about a father offering his 14 year old $6,000 to hurt Paul Botteron, and Ernest sent a text to his real wife
    suggesting he wants to kill Paul Botteron, and that asshole judge Michael L. Fabbri makes it a point to deliberately
    ignore the message in order to do what he does best:
    Prosecute! Prosecute! Prosecute! Prosecute atheists..

    That's why I smell malicious prosecution originating with Michael L. Fabbri

    I merely sent email to Ernest and Heather indicating the full path name.
    It was available to Lucien only thru Ernest or Heather.
    There is no other way for Lucien to access it or even know about it.
    He could not stumble upon it. He had to know the full pathname.

    Did Lucien even see it? Is it harassment if it's not harassment and Lucien doesn't see it anyway?

    There was no intent to harass. I have no desire to harass Lucien. I see no harassment in the message that nobody bothered to look at.

    There was intent to warn Ernest Shane Perce of the danger of what Lucien had said.

    The compelling reason.
    20 minute conversation between Lucien and myself at around 0017 on 20230827
    The audio shows that I have more compassion for Lucien than his father.

    At about the 7:50 mark in the video, Lucien stated that his father Ernest Shane Perce offered him $6,000 to deck Paul Botteron and bloody him.
    This struck me to just absolutely ludicrous and unacceptable to me. I'm thrilled that Lucien made the
    correct decision by not taking him up on the offer, given Lucien's anger management issues.
    Paul Botteron and Ernest Praise Perce (Ernest Shane Perce's elder son) were a gay couple until recently.

    I'm also offended by the notion that Ernest would use his own son Lucien to do something he himself is too much of a
    coward to do, knowing that the penalties on his son would be lesser because he is a minor (albeit 145 pounds, 5 feet, 11 inches).

    In addition, Ernest Shane Perce has a text on his phone sent to his wife (not the consort) that implies that he wants to kill Paul.

    Enjoy perusing his own web page where Ernest Shane Perce defines himself on his own page.


    
    You may also call: 1-866-EVADERS (382-3377).
    
    Or write to:
    Texas Child Support Evaders
    Office of the Attorney General
    Child Support Division
    PO Box 12017, MC 038M
    Austin, TX 78711-2017
    
    Office of the Attorney General
    Child Support Division
    P.O. Box 12017
    Austin, TX 78711-2017
    
    State of Texas Attorney General
    P.O. Box 659791
    San Antonio, TX 78265-9791
    Member ID# 01883233
    Case # 99-5129FL-C
    Case # 0602981351
    
    


Send comments to: hjw2001@gmail.com