Even if it might be part of Jesus's penis, testicles or asshole
David W. Cunis
![]()
First Justice, District Court, Framingham Division
Framingham, MA 01701 Email: david.cunis@jud.state.ma.us
University:
Boston College, A.B., 1986
Admitted: 1990
Current Salary: $160,000.00 (2014)
Previous Legal Employment:
![]()
This judge should be required to hang this sign in front of him so that we all know it, because, in all reality, this man is dumber than a brick. Our judiciary deserves something better than the barbaric, irrelevant, contradictory and nonsensical babblings of an ancient and ignorant religious bigot claiming to speak for an imaginary god.
If God has something to say, let Him speak for himself.
The only use this dumb ass has to science is as a test subject for the pharmaceutical, cosmetic and armaments industry.
Here we have over 3,000 reasons why Christianity is false
and his razor sharp inquisitive nature has yet to find one.
![]() Isn't it a tad arrogant and egotistical to believe that you are so important that you're going to be immortal in a paradise in the sky. Those who associate with him, like Carroll and Stoddart will get sucked into his cone of stupidity and ignorance.
![]()
This jerkoff thinks he's been put there by god. What a maroon! Holliston man nominated to be judge He clearly accepts cases of vandalism without any photographic evidence of such damage. David W. Cunis has been so corrupted and consumed by power in his position as a judge that he now believes he can hear, taste, smell and feel colors. He can probably taste music. He has become pompous, arrogant, and has developed an overblown sense of self-importance. He probably believes he is a superior being far removed from the great unwashed masses sans culottes. In reality, he is merely a primitive single brain cell organism masquerading as a human being.
![]()
According to a friend of David W. Cunis, Domenico Bettinelli, the Governor's Council selects David W. Cunis, a devout and orthodox catholic, as a judge. The page was recently removed (early March 2013) as were other similar ones but there is no way to erase all evidence.
![]() Posted by Domenico Bettinelli on 11/06/2006 at 09:38 AM
![]() David W. Cunis tries to pass himself off as an impartial judge but.... (and it's a big BUT), he is a devout orthodox catholic . In essence, he is a dangerous, religiously bigoted, medieval dinosaur but he doesn't want anyone to know. Becoming catholic is a monument in itself, to the cluelessnes and irredeemable stupidity of the believer.
His
esoteric beliefs
include magic gardens with magic trees and
talking serpents.
He believes that mankind
was created from dust with the
breath of a magical genocidal god
(his imaginary friend).
He simply cannot differentiate what is real and what is not real (fantasy).
His religion is not merely a temporal flight of fantasy, but a lifelong
delusion
of fantasy. His imaginary world
contains talking shrubbery
,
talking serpents
and many other interesting creatures. Did dinosaurs and man co-exist?
![]() Despite these outrageous beliefs, this man may actually be so irredeemably stupid that he does not suffer from cognitive dissonance. With beliefs like this, he is ten hairs away from being a baboon. If David W. Cunis belonged to a political party or a social club that was tied to as much bigotry, misogyny, homophobia, violence, pedophelia and sheer ignorance as religion is, he would be forced to resign in protest. To do otherwise is to be an enabler, a mafia wife. His holy book, the bible advocates prejudice, cruelty, superstition, murder and genocide. The entire Massachusetts judiciary openly accepts this bigotry, misogyny, homophobia, violence and sheer ignorance within its ranks even if they have yet to find evidence of these fictitious gods that is beyond a reasonable doubt. He may actually make eye contact with invisible things.
![]()
Tax dollars should never fund bigotry.
If this is correct, then the following can be said.
![]() Show me evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that your imaginary three-headed sky fairy exists . This man
May include parts and pieces of Jesus's
He accepts his three-headed God as his omnipotent, omniscient all
powerful dictator and has a personal relationship with the creator of
the universe.
All that God wants back from him is his mindless robotic obedience.
![]()
One has to suspect he has swallowed a MinusIQ pill sometime in his youth. Charles Darwin, who wrote On The Origin of Species described priests as black-robed beasts How do you a describe a black-robed judge like David W. Cunis who, as a devout orthodox Catholic is almost a priest, but without the celibacy.
![]()
If this idiot truly believed in the separation of church and state, then he simply would not allow any "holy scriptures" in the courts and he certainly would not ask people to take an oath of any kind that contains the word god. It is morons like him who want our blasphemy law to persists in our law books. He's just itching to use it against me. He is a member of the American Taliban (Christian edition) and the problem is that religion poisons everything. Does this make him an extremist in his religious views? How do you separate the man, the state, the law and religion from one man's mind? You can't. As such, all judges should be secular in nature. How can he possibly be fit to be an impartial judge in a real state court. Let him be a judge in the Vatican court. The Christian religion , as organized in its churches, has been and still is the principal enemy of moral progress in the world. Would he ever be allowed on the bench if he were a devout orthodox muslim? With such beliefs, David W. Cunis would better serve humanity in the psycho ward of an asylum (or a monestary) than as a judge in our state courtrooms. Alas, as quantum theory states, his brain is 99.99% empty space. Shouldn't judges have a more moderate view on any and all subjects? For the record, David W. Cunis has the compassion of a starving ferrel dog on steroids. In order to send me to prison he violated one of his ten commandments and allowed the DA Jessica Hogan to do the same.
![]() This tells me he is a just another hypocritical sanctimonious scumbag catholic.
Restraining Order:
The judge made it a condition of probation that I get a mental health evaluation. This amuses me greatly considering that he is a rabid devout orthodox catholic. The sole reason that judge David W. Cunis cannot be institutionalized in a mental institution (funny farm) is that his bizarre esoteric beliefs are in the majority in the United States. If he alone believed in this, any judge in the country would have him committed.
![]() To the good judge, I say the following....
![]()
How does a militant atheist get judged by a devout orthodox catholic judge? How do you separate law, religion and the state in the mind of a judge? You cannot know what he was thinking when he sentenced me and he won't discuss it. My web site http://the-militant-atheist.org has had well over half a million hits. I'm pretty sure David W. Cunis knows about it and I may have been subjected to religious persecution. That may explain his reversal on the charge of vandalism. The Crusades were conducted by the catholic church and they killed over 1.5 million people in the name of God. Think the The Crusades are over? Think again.
![]() Had I known what I now know about David W. Cunis, I would never have accepted him as a judge. He has destroyed my perception that judges are intelligent (at least more intelligent than juries).
![]()
If David W. Cunis was circumcised , then he has an imaginary covenant with his imaginary friend .
Judicial review
Removal Of Judges in Massachusetts Massachusetts judges may be removed in one of three ways: The commission on judicial conduct investigates complaints of judicial misconduct. Following a formal hearing, the commission may recommend to the supreme judicial court removal, retirement, or reprimand of a judge. The governor, with consent of the governor's council, may remove judges upon the joint address of both houses of the general court. The governor, with consent of the governor's council, may also retire judges because of advanced age or mental or physical disability. Judges may be impeached by the house of representatives and convicted by the senate. To say that I am disappointed with his judgement is a tremendous understatement. I am nevertheless trapped in his bizzare parallel dimension.
David W. Cunis convicted me of felony vandalism after examining her car but reversed his own decision within six weeks after determining that he saw no damage on the car door. Basically, he stated that he did not see what he saw. This is not surprising for someone who talks to invisible sky creatures. In my trial, we went to see the car that was allegedly vandalized. He thinks he saw damage and convicted me on non-existent damage but only vacated my felony vandalism after I served 25 days in prison and admitted he had seen no damage. He sees the damage the very same way he sees God. Both are non-existent. There was no damage, and there is no god.
There are currently 2.5 billion christians and across the span of 2,500 years have accumulated zero evidence for such a three-headed creature . Ancient Egyptian, Greek, Roman, Mayan, Aztec, and Anastasi texts or tablets do not document such a creature in their domains. Why not? Everything is made of atoms formed in stars and to date, we have identified 118 elements. The standard model of matter to date, has some 200 subatomic particles. What sort of atoms and particles constitute the blessed holy trinity? What identifying factors make them "blessed" and "holy" versus "not blessed" and "unholy"? Inquiring minds wish to know. Judge David W. Cunis once told me "The burden of proof rests exclusively with the Commonwealth and it is a strict and heavy burden. The burden of proof is proof beyond a reasonable doubt.". I'm sure the great, wise and learned judge David W. Cunis whose intellect towers above those of the tiny minded plebians wasting oxygen on this planet, to write a rivetting, enlightening and air tight case for the existence of such a three headed creature, and providing hard scientific evidence as (a) matter of course. Scientific facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. This idiot doesn't even understand science. |
Send comments to:
![]() |