I sincerely doubt that any of these assholes has even attempted to petition the General Court (state legislature)
to get rid of the blasphemy law . It shows their fervent religiousity.

At least the punishments have been toned down from 1697

Every judge should have

  • a recent picture of themselves
  • their home address,
  • their home/work telephone numbers
  • their email address

They are all public servants and they are paid above $160,000 a year. We the taxpayers deserve better from these overpaid, underworked miscreants.

Any judge that is infected with religion is terrified of disclosing that religion because they know (beyond a reasonable doubt) they would be ridiculed for their beliefs.

Do you think a hard core christian can get a fair shake under an openly gay judge. What if the judge hid his gayness? Judges have wide discretion on any case before them.

They are just a bunch of little pompous pretentious cocksuckers and pussies who want to stay about as anonymous as they can. As a general rule, they also fail to show any sense of compassion, humanity or empathy and they definitely believe in their own superiority.

If you have been to court, you will note that they DO NOT introduce themselves in the courtroom.

They demand that you stand in court when they come in or out. They demand respect. Try not standing up, see what happens.

There is no law that requires you to stand up in court.

All district/prosecuting attorneys are merely judges in waiting hoping to land one of those lucrative judge positions and remain there for life unless you get caught in bed with a dead girl or live boy

Most if not all judges were former prosecutors. It is in reality the only path to become a judge, a lifetime job. If you are a prosecutor, you can be observed by others and vetted in the court. It's an adversarial system. Examine the quote of the Justice Department

Qui Pro Domina Justitia Sequitur?

Who prosecutes on behalf of justice?

There is some work involved in currying the favor of the Governor and particularly, sucking up to the members of the Governor's Council.

And always, there will be the intoxication of power, constantly increasing and constantly growing subtler.

Most judges are seen as very vindictive by nature mainly because most of them come from the prosecutorial side (were lawyers, became DAs and then judges). They seem most vindictive after 3 PM any day and especially on Friday. They are less vindictive at 9 AM if they show up, and just after lunch (with or without 3 martinis).

Some judges are on a first name basis with the DAs and police department.

In many cases, like one of mine, one can see that the division between judges, DAs and police are very blurred, especially when you see the judge, the DA and the police officer exiting the courtroom thru the judges chambers (back door). They're in cahoots . This is when you realize these people are stupid, vindictive and malicious.

Evil is always done under the cover of darkness or legalese and sometimes both..

If you know the religious affiliations of any judge, please contact me, in some way to pass along that information to me and I will document it.

These people have forgotten that they are quivering, living, breathing, dreaming, thinking, speaking, fornicating, urinating, defacating, decaying biodegradable multicellular meat popscicles.

Once a judge is selected to be on the court, (s)he gains the title of Honorable. Imperical evidence suggests that once an individual is selected by our schmuck governor to be on the judiciary, and the governor's pick is approved by the Governor's Council, they invite the new judge to have the word Honorable branded/tattooed on his/her ass.

It's a pity they don't come with a tattoo on their forehead that specifies their stupid religious beliefs.

We should be thankful, they did not take on the the following titles:

  • Your Lordship
  • Lord Of The Realm
  • Glorious Leader

A large collage of all the faces of Massachusetts judges would show pretty much a lilly-white organization. We could place the darker judges in the back of the collage, so to say.

Judges have traditionally worn black robes, the color of evil, the color of darkness, the color of night, the same color as priests and satanists. Gang colors :-)

Perhaps a cyber attack will leak the esoteric pornography habits of judges. How many like kiddie porn vs fat black women porn.

Every judge's web page should also show

  • How many cases they have had for each year (work ethic)
  • the racial makeup of the defendants in their cases,
  • how many defendants they have sent to jail (by race) in any given year.
  • how many defendants they have sent to jail (by religion) in any given year

These people think very highly of themselves, but I would like to see one of these arrogant little pussies get themselves a Master's Degree in Computer Science like mine.

Judges are simply lawyers who have done enough politcal favors to get a life time job with the state. Most were probably too inept to start their own law practice so they take the easy path of political favoritism. Kiss an ass here and there, and POOF! You have an easy peasy job for life.

Lawyers are there to argue the points of law in case the supposedly knowledgable judges have conveniently forgotten the law and the concept of justice and they exercise their religious biases on public atheists.

One has to wonder how many judges in Massachusetts have scant grasp of the most basic legal principles. One may suspect some never got through high school, and some went no further than grade school.

There does not seem to be any state agency that in any way monitors the presence or absence of judges in any Massachusetts courtroom. Judges are presumed to be responsible enough to monitor themselves. Bullshit.

My experience in the courts shows that in the summer time, judges tend to be absent mostly on Fridays and Mondays. This provides them with long weekends on the cape, an escape from their tiresome, stressful and underpaid ($160,000) job, as we are constantly told.

There should be as many judges in a given courthouse, as there are courtrooms. Framingham has three courtrooms and a traffic courtroom. On most summer days, only Courtroom 1 is operational. We, the public should have easy access to their work history.

I'm surprised that judges do not wear tall hats in courts so they could appear taller than you. It's part of the intimidation process when you have a position of power. The black robe is essential when conducting evil. Knowing better, doing worse.

It should be a requirement for a new judge to spend three months in an MCI prison, including one month in solitary confinement, as a condition to accept a lifetime job getting paid over $160,000 a year.

They demand that you stand in court when they come in or out. They demand respect. Try not standing up, see what happens.

Every lawyer (defense attorney, DA or judge) that I have seen allow for the corruption of the courts. Each time the court bailiff (the court security officer, usually a big goon) tells those in attendance in the courtroom to stand up, these lawyers, DAs and judges are knowingly promoting the corruption of the judiciary. There is no law requiring anyone to stand up in order to show respect to the court. I have not seen a single lawyer/DA or judge ever object to this corruption. The stupid bailiff in the Framingham court will object if you are reading a book while waiting your turn. There is no law that states I cannot read a book in court.

This corruption shows that judges just enjoy pounding their judicial breasts like drummers on soggy drums.

Any judge who does not comply with his oath to the Constitution of the United States wars against that Constitution and engages in acts in violation of the supreme law of the land. The judge is engaged in acts of treason. The U.S. Supreme Court has stated that "no state legislator or executive or judicial officer can war against the Constitution without violating his undertaking to support it".
In Re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (188);

This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the constitution or laws of any state to the contrary notwithstanding.

Supremacy Clause: Article 6, Clause 2

The United States is entirely a creature of the Constitution. Its power and authority have no other source. It can only act in accordance with all the limitations imposed by the Constitution.
Reid v Covert 354 US l (1957)

Every judge in every court of the States is under oath or affirmation to support the Constitution of the United States. When any litigation arises out of the constitution of his State or out of any of its laws it is by this clause made his duty to "be bound" by the National Constitution and laws and in a proper case to hold the State constitution or law to be void for conflict with "the supreme law of the land."

When a judge acts intentionally and knowingly to deprive a person of his constitutional rights, he exercises no discretion or individual judgment; he acts no longer as a judge, but as a "minister" of his own religious prejudices.
Pierson v. Ray , 386 U.S. 547 at 567 (1967). The laws that we are supposed to be fully aware of and abide by are so complex that there is an entire profession dedicated to understanding them. One that takes 8 years to master.

When one of these idiot judges testifies during a defendant's competency hearing, the idiot judge shall wear a cone-shaped hat that is not less than two feet tall. The surface of the hat shall be imprinted with stars and lightning bolts. Additionally, an idiot judge shall be required to don a white beard that is not less than 18 inches in length and shall punctuate crucial elements of his testimony by stabbing the air with a wand. Whenever an idiot judge provides expert testimony regarding a defendant's competency, the bailiff shall contemporaneously dim the courtroom lights and administer two strikes to a Chinese gong

As a public militant atheist, I would like to do some biblical cherry picking much like these alleged judges. First, the bible (holiest of the holies) is accepted as the word of God, which is perfect in every way (Psalm 19:7).

The First Commandment says "Thou shall have no other gods before me". Deuteronomy 17:2-5 states that atheists should be stoned. Leviticus 24:16 states that those who commit blasphemy should be stoned and Exodus 31:15 states that those who work on the sabbath should be stoned. This lovely bible commands its followers to kill millions. The koran is even worse. These books define the morality of its followers.

How dare the jews complain about anti-semitism (a vague term meaning anti-jewish) when their holy book commands its followers to kill me and millions of others and allows slavery. The penalty for apostasy and being an atheist in the koran is death.

There is nothing wrong with inciting intense dislike of any religion (jews, christians, muslims, sikhs) if the activities or teachings of that religion are so outrageous, irrational or abusive of human rights that they deserve to be intensely disliked?

Send comments to: hjw2001@gmail.com